Through Thick and Thin

Acts 7:54-60

I Peter 2:13-23

John 14:1-7

 

Well, the election is over. At least some of the tumult and shouting has died. We have a new government. And now the business of moving from slogans to policy implementation begins. We will have to wait to see how that unfolds!

 

Now isn’t the moment to comment on religion and politics, though the temptation is there, and plenty has been said in the campaign about the two and how they relate, or should relate. But since it is a time of heightened political interest and even passion, I would like to make some observations that arise from the kind of political debate that we have been through in the past few weeks.

 

We all saw pictures on tele of political rallies, shopping mall meetings between voters and candidates, Q & A sessions and so on. In many of these encounters, people held placards with certain messages emblazoned on them: ‘Truth not Spin’; ‘Justice for all’; ‘Freedom for Asylum Seekers’; and so on. And of course there were broad slogans coming from the polys’ side as well: remember ‘moving forward’ and ‘real action’!

 

When I saw such signs I knew, or thought I knew, roughly what they meant. What is more, I felt I could recognise the values the demonstrators were upholding. The sign “truth not spin”: it wasn’t arguing some sophisticated theory of truth and reality, about which large books are written. It meant something much more direct: like wanting true statements from political leaders; not wanting to be lied to. And the “justice” placard; that wasn’t some hefty left or right wing theory of merit and entitlement. It meant rather something like the longing for an end to gross inequality in our society , a fair go for all in education, or health, or work. Even ‘moving forward’ and ‘real action’ pointed to significant aspirations for our community; like not losing sight of important public developments we have worked for; and being practical, sleeves rolled up and doing something positive, not just indulging in rhetorical ping pong in our public life. And so on.

 

Now those placard holders and politicians might have been happy with my understanding and sympathy. But I bet Canberra to a brick, not all of them would be happy with my view on how the ideas of justice, truth and action might best be implemented in our land. What does justice mean for mining companies in Western Australia? There’s a big debate about that one. What does ‘moving forward’ mean in relation to boat arrivals on our shores. Not a lot of agreement there either. And what does truthfulness in emissions trading amount to? Again, no easy consensus. Most of us can agree that truth, justice and freedom are central and important moral and political issues for our land. But how those ideas are worked out in concrete detail generates strong debate all round.

 

Philosophers have a term to describe this interesting difference. They speak of “thick” and “thin” moral meanings, and both are important in any moral debate. A “thin” account of our political situation is expressed in the signs of the demonstrators: justice, truth, freedom, action. They are important words and important aspirations. And they rightly command far-reaching respect and support. But by themselves they don’t redress a situation of unjust work practices, or spin doctoring, or unequal education opportunities. For that to happen a “thick” account must be given; an account that takes into consideration particular circumstances in all their messy complexity.

 

You will be glad to know, I don’t intend to offer my political solution to the challenges facing our nation. But I want to take this distinction between thick and thin and apply it to our scripture readings this morning.

 

Let’s start with the Gospel. There are famous words here. None more famous than Jesus’ reply to Thomas’ question about all his talk of going away and coming back. “We don’t know where you’re going, how can we know the way?” And Jesus replies: “I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (v 6)

 

Those words are affirmed by Christians everywhere, in Northern Territory as in Hobart; in India as in America; in Iceland as in Australia, in Chile as in Germany. They are like signs at a demonstration: “way”, “truth”, “life”. Yes! that is who Jesus is for Christians. And authentic Christian life is to follow that way; conform to that truth; and live that life. The text has a universality that grabs us. But it is also a “thin” account in this technical sense of the term. It does not spell out what following that way, believing that truth, living that life means for us at Kingston, ACT in the 21st century, as distinct, say, from what it meant for Julian of Norwich to live it in Medieval England, or Bishop Tutu to live it in multiracial South Africa. Or even for fellow Baptists in Melbourne or Adelaide to live it. To discover that, we have to “thicken” the account to fit with, and become incarnate in, the particular situations we are in. And that means risk, prayer, hard thought, debate and a good deal of trial and error I suspect. Just like in the political realm.

 

Look at our readings from Acts and I Peter. The Acts story tells of the death of Stephen, the first Christian martyr. Now we can scarcely doubt that Stephen took Jesus as his guide to the way, his touchstone of truth, and his example of life. But he thickened it out in a very particular form. He chose to bear a public, confronting, uncompromising witness to Jesus right in the middle of the powerful people who, only weeks ago, had been responsible for judging, rejecting, and murdering Jesus as a service to God. Like Jesus, Stephen sticks to his witness knowing that it will cost his life. Like Jesus, he gives his life with complete unselfishness as testimony to the selfless love of the Father. Like Jesus, he prays that the rejection he suffers will not be held against them. That’s not just carrying the placard of Christianity. That’s living it in the thick of things.

 

But now Peter. As much as Stephen, Peter wants his church to follow the way, know the truth, and live the life of Jesus. But in Peter’s case the “thick” outworking is almost the opposite. “Slaves accept the authority of your masters with all deference, not only those who are kind and gentle, but also those who are harsh.” (I P 2:18) And his justification of this is exactly that it mirrors the action of Jesus. “For if you endure when you do right and suffer for it, you have God’s approval. For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his steps.” (vv 20-21).

 

Stephen and Peter agree that faithful discipleship means following the way of the crucified and risen Jesus. Their “thin” accounts are identical. But the living out of that way in their very different circumstances—Stephen in post-resurrection Jerusalem, Peter in the church of the Diaspora—results in very different practices of the faith. Stephen opposes the status quo outright, boldly, fatally. Thus he follows Jesus. Peter recommends acceptance and patient endurance of the status quo, hard though it is. So he follows. The basic pattern is the same, but the living of it differs according to the context in which it has to be lived.

 

There are three things I want to draw out for our reflection on our own discipleship.

 

1. I need to be reminded that my commitment to the “thin” elements of the faith, vital though it is, needs to be “thickened” out in my daily living, made incarnate where I am. I love theology and preaching. Texts like, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” can fill me with misty-eyed sentiment and wonderful Christological speculation and rhetoric. And that has its place. But I also need to hear, “Well, come on Graeme, thicken it up a bit. How are you going to follow that way, act out that truth and live out that life in your family, in the use of your money, in the political causes you get involved with?” St Paul is acid on this: “Though I speak with the tongue of mortals and of angels”; that is, though I hold the signs with the best and expound the texts with the most eloquent, if I don’t live the life—and Paul put it in terms of love, if I don’t actually love others in my world—“I am a noisy gong and clanging cymbal”. Thin without thick is empty.  It is in politics and it is in faith.

 

2. But the relationship works the other way as well. I am sure you felt it instinctively listening to the Peter reading, to say nothing of some of our political rhetoric. I don’t doubt that Peter’s advice to the slaves in his congregation had “thick” importance in his context. But this “thick” expression needs to be questioned by the “thin” universal principles of Jesus call. In a different historical context, William Wilberforce heard the call of Jesus in very different terms. Not acquiescence to the institution of slavery, but a profound challenge to its very existence is how he “thickened up” the call of Jesus.

 

We have seen this dynamic tension at work in the church worldwide. How often has the Peter principle of patient submission been used to justify the subordination of women in the church? Or the exclusion of people from the Lord ’s Table? And how important in achieving justice in our world and in our church has been holding up of the signs—the way, the truth, the life—in calling us all to re-think our practical actions in the light of the deep gospel truths manifest in Jesus’ journey to the cross. Thick without thin is blind. And this is also true in politics as in faith.

 

3. This conversation between the thick and the thin drives the dynamic of Christian thinking and living, as it does of politics in a different way. But it is not something I can do for myself. I am much too prone to see things in ways that suit me. I need the community, you my fellow travellers in the faith, to be in conversation with me. Sometimes I need you to say, “yes, yes, Graeme, we hear all that, but thicken it up a bit. Get yourself involved in this particular need, in your own life, in the church, in the community; just do it”. On the other hand, I also need you to say from time to time, “Hey, step back a bit. Test what you are doing against the deep, simple and essential elements of Jesus’ call. Actions need always to be critically evaluated in light of the basic truths of the Gospel.”

 

This back and forth conversation between thick and thin in our community is essential. It is essential in politics and it is essential in the church. It goes to the heart of how we live out the call of Christ in our real situation, and how our situation can be changed by the real call of Christ.

 

May God guide us through thick and thin, as we seek to be Christ’s disciples in this world, and good citizens in our land.

 

 

Graeme Garrett

Canberra Baptist Church

Thirteenth Sunday after Pentecost

22 August 2010