|
"Mary
Magdalene - courageous witness to the risen Lord"
Texts: John 20:1-18, Isaiah 43:8-13
Sermon preached by Rev. Jeanette Mathews
18 May 2003
The First Witness to the Resurrection?
In this mission month for the Baptist churches
of Australia it seemed appropriate in my series on women in the bible to look
at the first New Testament missionary bearing the news of the resurrection of
Jesus Christ. Mary Magdalene is a prominent person in the gospel accounts,
particularly in the stories told of the cross and the empty tomb. To know
anything about her we have to rely on the gospels, because she isn't
mentioned anywhere else in the New Testament. Indeed, she is ignored where she
might have been mentioned. If we look at Paul's famous resurrection passage
in the letter to the Corinthians he says Jesus appeared "first to Peter,
then to the Twelve, then to 500 brothers at one time, then to James, then to
all the apostles, and last of all to me."
And even in the gospels there is some doubt
surrounding the witness of Mary Magdalene and the other women to the
significant event of the resurrection of Jesus:
In the earliest Gospel of Mark we read that
Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Salome went to anoint the body of
Jesus, but found the burial place empty except for a young man who gave them
the amazing news of Jesus' resurrection, and the task to go and tell his
disciples the news. But then we read: "So they went out and fled from the
tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to
anyone, for they were afraid." (Mk 16:6-8)
Luke more clearly identifies the messenger as
an angel in his version of the empty tomb story, but the message was still
given to women - "Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and
the other women with them." But Luke records that to the apostles the
words of the women "seemed to them an idle tale, and they did not believe
them." (Lk 24:10-11)
Reasons for doubt
The note of doubt in these stories could have
been due to the lack of credibility given to the witness of women in those
times - which incidentally makes it all the more profound that the gospels
recorded the stories about the women.
It also could reflect the very real danger
there would have been for anyone who identified with the crucified
Jesus. If we thought about the actions of these women against the background
of Roman policy we would have a new respect for them. Even weeping in public
over the death of an executed person could result in the mourner also being
executed, and women and children were not exempt from this. No funerals were
allowed - which was intended to be a punishment for the friends and family
of the criminal. Soldiers guarded the dead bodies, or left them on the crosses
to be eaten by wild animals. When the gospels tell us the women stood
"afar off" at the crucifixion scene, we realise they were trying to
stay unrecognised but putting their lives in danger nonetheless. Going to the
grave would also be a punishable offence - the authorities were wary of
executed enemies of the empire being made into heroes and their graves
becoming a place of pilgrimage. (The same thing happened in South Africa when
there was an active resistance struggle against apartheid policy. Funerals
were sometimes "banned" by the government, particularly when
teenagers or children had been murdered). So if the women were risking their
lives, we have an explanation for the great fear they felt even when they
believed he had been raised - those of us who were at the Easter
Sunday@seven gathering will remember we were puzzling over the fear of the
women at the end of Mark's gospel.
We've thought of a couple of reasons why the
witness of women to the resurrection was in doubt, a third reason could be
simply due to a patriarchal bias in the history of the church. It's only in
recent years as women are again finding their place in the church that we are
going back and re-reading the early documents - sometimes even reading between
the lines to find the women. And we are discovering that women were
active and influential in the church that came into being as a result of Jesus'
life, teachings, death and resurrection.
What can we say about Mary Magdalene?
It seems that Mary Magdalene was an
important figure in the New Testament church. I wonder what you would say if I
asked what you know about her? You might have been influenced by the character
in Jesus Christ Superstar, who sings the haunting song "I don't know
how to love him" or the many portraits of her in renaissance art when she
was a popular subject - usually young and beautiful and penitent. Sometimes
she is naked and covered only by her long hair - suggesting perhaps the hair
suits of penitents in the middle ages. You might even know her as the patron
saint of perfume, and she is almost always depicted with a jar of ointment to
remind us that she was intending to anoint the body of Jesus in the tomb.
Many, including Andrew Lloyd Webber, assume she was a prostitute and
particularly in the western church she became the embodiment of the great
sinner reformed by Christ. In contrast the eastern church traditions depicted
her as a person with special revelation from Jesus, who would be elevated by
angels while praying and miraculously fed while meditating in the desert. A
commentary on the extra-biblical materials about this woman says "the
Mary Magdalene described in the Gospels has undergone an amazing change in the
course of centuries."
In reality there is very little information
about her in the bible. She is mentioned in Luke 8 where we hear she was
"exorcised of seven demons" (Lk 8:2-3). Demon possession was an
explanation for both physical and mental illnesses, suggesting that she may
have been epileptic or suffering from an illness such as depression. There is
no suggestion in the biblical accounts that she was a prostitute or great
sinner. Perhaps because there is so little information about her she
has become merged with other unnamed women in the Gospels - the woman who
anointed Jesus in Luke and even the Samaritan woman at the well. The one long
narrative that is about her and that we read this morning from John's
gospel gives her character some shape and has influenced later ways of
thinking about her. She has been described as "impetuous and
loving", and some have seen echoes of the woman in the Song of Solomon
who seeks after her lover.
It seems she was one of the women of means who
supported Jesus' ministry - she was quite possibly a widow although she is
never defined in relation to a man. Though she is thought of as young and
beautiful, which for some explains her close relationship to Jesus, she could
just as easily be an older woman who was a motherly or surrogate aunt figure.
She is often in the company of Mary the mother of Jesus when mentioned in the
gospels.
What else can we say about her? When grouped
with other women her name always appears first except once in John's account
of the crucifixion where he names the relatives of Jesus standing near the
cross along with Mary Magdalene (19:25). We find her name in all four gospels
and all of them agree that she was present at both the crucifixion and the
empty tomb. Her prominence in the resurrection stories suggest she was a
leader who held a position of spiritual authority in the early church. It's
even possible that her name, Magdalene, didn't define where she came from
but was a translation of a Hebrew word meaning "great", so that she
was Mary the Great to distinguish her from the many other Marys in the New
Testament as well as define her position of authority. In the passage from
John that we have read this morning Jesus appeared to her alone and
commissioned her to tell the other disciples of his resurrection. By the 3rd
century she was referred to as an apostle, and St Augustine called her
"apostle to the apostles" in recognition that she was the one who
brought the news of the resurrection to the disciples. The 12th
century illustration on the cover of today's bulletin shows her doing just
that.
A courageous and faithful disciple
The gospel of John depicts her as one of the
ideal disciples of the gospel. When Jesus speaks her name and she recognises
his voice she is an example of the statement he made earlier in the gospel,
"I am the good shepherd.my sheep know my voice". Unlike Thomas she
does not need to touch Jesus to believe he is real, and she
unquestioningly does what he tells her.
One of the most certain things we can say about
her was that she was a courageous woman. Remembering the danger of mourning
for an enemy of the Roman state, we can agree with the comment that "at
the darkest and most uncertain moments, when others had withdrawn, even Jesus'
mother according to the Synoptic gospels, Mary Magdalene faithfully remained
in Jesus presence. This was a strong woman." (Women in Scripture, p. 122)
Woman, why are you weeping?
Since Mary is asked by the angels in the tomb
and the risen Jesus "Why are you weeping?" we should also ask if her
tears fit with the picture of a strong and courageous woman who would be the
first witness to the resurrection.
I believe that her weeping embodied the fear
and mourning of the whole community of the faithful. She may have been in
despair but she was there, the men were still in hiding. Her tears
captured the terrible possibility that all hope had been destroyed with Jesus'
death. If God had abandoned Jesus, then his promise of a kingdom ruled by
justice and peace would also have to be abandoned. The hope of the
downtrodden, the poor, the diseased, the demon possessed - all who had been
given a new life by Jesus - this hope had also died on the cross. Mary's
tears were not mere sentimentalism. They were a profound expression of the
possibility of abandonment. Yet because she was there she witnessed the wonder
of hope reborn. And she was given the task to "Go and tell"
- that there is a power stronger than death, that God is on
the side of life, that new life is possible.
We, too, are witnesses to the Resurrection
And so as the witness to the hope of Jesus'
resurrection, Mary Magdalene functions for us as an example to follow. The
witness did not stop with her - her name disappears from the New Testament
but we know that she passed on the good news, and those who heard it also
passed it on, and before long the church was born. The message has been passed
to us also, and we are still witnesses of this good news. The words of the
risen Jesus to his first followers are words spoken to us today. "Go and
tell" (Mk 16:7) "You are witnesses of these things." (Lk 24:48)
And note his choice of words - at the command
of Jesus we are witnesses (Luke 24:36ff) He didn't say "you will
be witnesses" so that we could excuse ourselves on the basis of not
knowing enough or not being experienced enough or not being good enough. He
didn't say "you should be witnesses" so that we are
motivated out of guilt, recognising the familiar distance between what we are
and what we ought to be. No. The followers of Jesus are his witnesses
- the way we are is the way he will be shown to the world around us, with
all our shortcomings, our good intentions, our personalities, our statements,
our attitudes.
Remember the Isaiah passage we read earlier in
the service? Where Isaiah's imagination has God on trial in a courtroom, and
witnesses are called to attest to the character of God - even deaf and blind
Israel who had been God's people but had so often refused to hear the voice
of God or see the action of God in their history, even they were told -
"you are my witnesses."
We've been trained in the church to think of
ourselves being on trial with Jesus as judge. But these passages that remind
us we are witnesses puts Jesus in the seat of the defendant. We need to
remember that the judgment of the court concerning the God who is revealed in
Jesus will be determined by our witness.
Will Jesus be dismissed as irrelevant?
Will Jesus be judged uncaring and indifferent?
Will Jesus be pleaded unfit for trial because of the lack of agreement
amongst his witnesses?
Will Jesus be considered guilty of making no difference at all despite his
claims?
The Easter message wasn't finished for the
year as we sang alleluia on Easter morning and ate our last Easter egg. Easter
day was only the beginning of the story, we now need to witness to our risen
Lord. Go and tell. Go and make disciples. You are my witnesses. These words
weren't addressed to preachers, evangelists, and professionals. They were
addressed to scared disciples, fishermen and tradesmen. They were even
addressed to women. All we are asked to do is to witness to what we have heard
and what we have seen. Do you know Jesus is alive?
Have you sensed his presence amongst a
community of faith?
Have you known an underlying peace in the midst of hard times?
Are you aware of something sustaining you as you move through the ordinary
days of your life?
Is the presence of Christ alive when you join with others in an effort to
bring a change to the city we live in? At Stuart Flats? At Commonwealth
Park next weekend?
In this mission month it is good for us to
remember that being witnesses doesn't only involve living in a different
culture and learning another language. It is about realising that the world is
looking at us to see who Jesus is. We only have to hear the message, and like
Mary Magdalene, obey the voice of Christ. Go and tell. You are my
witnesses. Amen.
Ideas for this sermon came with the help
of the following resources:
Dorothée Sölle, "Woman, why are you
weeping?" in Great Women of the Bible in Art and Literature
(1994:278)
Joe H Kirchberger, "Mary of Magdala" in Great Women of the Bible
in Art and Literature (1994:280)
Carolyn Osiek, "Mary 3" in Women in Scripture (2000:120-122)
Patrick J. Willson, "The Second Act of Easter" in Pulpit Digest
(MA 1997:75)
|